<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.00">
<channel>
<title> OpticDistraction Photoblog</title>
<link> http://www.opticdistraction.com/photoblog </link>
<description>Recent entries from the OpticDistraction Photoblog</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<webMaster>justin@opticdistraction.com (Justin Gallagher)</webMaster>
<copyright>Copyright Tully Rohrer and Justin Gallagher, 2005-2006</copyright>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:32:20 -0700</pubDate>
<item>
<title>Motions</title>
<guid>http://www.opticdistraction.com/index.php?d=2007-02-21&amp;c=1015#info</guid>
<link>http://www.opticdistraction.com/index.php?d=2007-02-21&amp;c=1015#info</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[
Image: Motions
On: 2007-02-23 06:08:19 Uwe said: 
Very well processed. The silver toning works very well here.

]]>
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 06:08:19 -0800</pubDate>
<author>tully@opticdistraction.com (Tully)</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Motions</title>
<guid>http://www.opticdistraction.com/index.php?d=2007-02-21&amp;c=1012#info</guid>
<link>http://www.opticdistraction.com/index.php?d=2007-02-21&amp;c=1012#info</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[
Image: Motions
On: 2007-02-21 20:04:59 Becky said: 
Even though you might just be &amp;#8221;going through the&amp;#8221; I do like the title a lot in relation to the photograph, just because of the stagnant and picturesque feeling of the black and white. I feel like it really might not have that same effect were it in color.

]]>
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:04:59 -0800</pubDate>
<author>tully@opticdistraction.com (Tully)</author>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>