<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.00">
<channel>
<title> OpticDistraction Photoblog</title>
<link> http://www.opticdistraction.com/photoblog </link>
<description>Recent entries from the OpticDistraction Photoblog</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<webMaster>justin@opticdistraction.com (Justin Gallagher)</webMaster>
<copyright>Copyright Tully Rohrer and Justin Gallagher, 2005-2006</copyright>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 03:06:34 -0700</pubDate>
<item>
<title>Red House Painter</title>
<guid>http://www.opticdistraction.com/index.php?d=2007-02-09&amp;c=978#info</guid>
<link>http://www.opticdistraction.com/index.php?d=2007-02-09&amp;c=978#info</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[
Image: Red House Painter
On: 2007-02-11 05:24:18 Peter Martin Jorgensen said: 
Funny. The title made me think of Red House Painters. Ok shot, but not your best :)

]]>
</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 05:24:18 -0800</pubDate>
<author>tully@opticdistraction.com (Tully)</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Red House Painter</title>
<guid>http://www.opticdistraction.com/index.php?d=2007-02-09&amp;c=974#info</guid>
<link>http://www.opticdistraction.com/index.php?d=2007-02-09&amp;c=974#info</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[
Image: Red House Painter
On: 2007-02-09 06:59:37 v said: 
it might be itneresting to completely desaturate most of the picture desaturate to black and white, except for the painting.

]]>
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 06:59:37 -0800</pubDate>
<author>tully@opticdistraction.com (Tully)</author>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>